• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Fakülteler
  • Tıp Fakültesi
  • Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Fakülteler
  • Tıp Fakültesi
  • Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of laparoscopic adnexal mass extraction via the transumbilical and transvaginal routes

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam metin / Article (775.4Kb)

Date

2022

Author

Güngördük, Kemal
Gülseren, Varol
Özdemir, İsa Aykut

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Kemal Güngördük, Varol Gülseren & İsa Aykut Özdemir (2022): Comparison of laparoscopic adnexal mass extraction via the transumbilical and transvaginal routes, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2106556

Abstract

This study was performed to compare the transumbilical (TU) and transvaginal (TV) routes for adnexal mass removal from the abdominal cavity. Data from 93 women who underwent laparoscopic (LS) surgery for the removal of benign adnexal masses at three centres between January 2016 and December 2020 were examined retrospectively. The specimen retrieval times in the TU and TV groups were 9.0 +/- 2.0 and 9.8 +/- 2.5 min, respectively (p = .373). Additional analgesic was required in 13.8% and 14.3% of cases in the TU and TV groups, respectively. The mean 3-month (2-4 months) postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was lower in the TV group than in the TU group. The postoperative vaginal length did not differ between the TU and TV groups (8.9 (8.7-9.1) vs. 8.7 (8.4-9.1) cm; p = .465). Oophorectomy and the TU route were found to be independent risk factors for the worsening of the VAS score. Sexual function index scores were similar in the two groups. The TV method for specimen removal in LS surgery may cause less pain in the early postoperative period and less dyspareunia in the later period without shortening the length of the vagina.Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Compared with open procedures, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with faster recovery times, better patient quality of life and lower postoperative complication rates. The removal of an adnexal mass from the abdominal cavity is performed most commonly using the suprapubic, transumbilical (TU) or transvaginal (TV) route. What do the results of this study add? The specimen retrieval times in the TU and TV groups were 9.0 +/- 2.0 and 9.8 +/- 2.5 min, respectively (p = .373). The mean 3-month (2-4 months) postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was lower in the TV group than in the TU group. Oophorectomy and the TU route were found to be independent risk factors for the worsening of the VAS score. Sexual function index scores were similar in the two groups. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? In conclusion, specimen removal via the TV route in LS surgery may cause less pain in the early postoperative period and less dyspareunia in the later period without reducing the length of the vagina.

Source

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY

URI

https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2022.2106556
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/10239

Collections

  • Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu [543]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6219]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6466]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Muğla

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Guide|| Instruction || Library || Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University || OAI-PMH ||

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Muğla:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.