Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGorgen, Izzet
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Melek
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T16:20:21Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T16:20:21Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1302-597X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/3890
dc.descriptionWOS: 000330371200011en_US
dc.description.abstractProblem Statement: Knowledge map (K-map) is a means of schematically displaying important verbal information in a text and relations among the pieces of information. In a K-map, information in a text is presented as node-link-node assemblies. There are two main approaches to the use of K-maps. First one is to train students to generate their own K-maps. And the second one is to use expert-generated K-maps. Purpose: The purpose of the present study is to determine whether expert-generated or student-generated knowledge maps have more positive influences on students' acquisition and recall levels. In light of the findings of the present study it is intended to find out which type of knowledge map is more effective and some suggestions will be made to develop better learning-teaching activities in elementary education. Methods: The present study, pre-and post-test experimental design with a control group is used. For the study, Experimental Group (Student-generated Knowledge Map) and Control Group (Expert-generated Knowledge Map) were determined with equal possibility. The study group of the present research consists of 29 eight grade students. Two data collection instruments were used to collect data in the study. One of them is "space relations aptitude test" and the other one is 31-item multiple choice "Acquisition Level Test" developed to evaluate the acquisition and recall levels of the students in relation to the text entitled "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs". In the present study, the text entitled "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs" was used on which K-maps would be constructed. Findings and Results: No significant difference was found between the acquisition and recall scores of the control group students using the expert-generated K-maps and those of the experimental group students using the student-generated K-maps. This shows that using whether the expert-generated K-maps or student-generated K-maps did not lead to significant difference in acquisition and recall levels. Recommendations: In light of the findings of the present study, it can be argued that use of expert-generated K-maps in learning-teaching process has effects on acquisition and recall levels of students similar to the effects of using student-generated K-maps. Both expert-generated and student-generated K-maps can be used in the learning-teaching process built on constructivist approach.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAni Yayinciliken_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge Mapen_US
dc.subjectAcquisition Levelen_US
dc.subjectRecall Levelen_US
dc.subjectStudent-Generated and Expert-Generated Knowledge Mapsen_US
dc.titleThe Effects of Using Student-Generated and Expert-Generated Knowledge Maps on Acquisition and Recallen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentTemp[Gorgen, Izzet] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Educ Fac, Mugla, Turkey -- [Yildirim, Melek] Mugla Natl Minist Educ, Mugla, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue53Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage171en_US
dc.identifier.endpage184en_US
dc.relation.journalEgitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster