Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Derya
dc.contributor.authorGüler, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorBaşer, Emre
dc.contributor.authorKabukçu, Cihan
dc.contributor.authorFenkçi, Veysel
dc.contributor.authorSivaslıoğlu, Akın
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T17:17:08Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T17:17:08Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2468-7847
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101922
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/6268
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 32977045en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate whether apical prolapse in addition to early-stage anterior prolapse has any effect on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Methods: Patients with early-stage pelvic organ prolapse (POP) were retrospectively analyzed at the urogynecology unit of a tertiary referral center. Cases with posterior POP were excluded, and the remaining women were distributed across four main groups: (1) no determinable anterior and/or apical POP (control); (2) isolated anterior POP; (3) anterior + apical POP; and (4) isolated apical POP. Each LUTS symptom in these groups was recorded. Women with isolated anterior POP and women with anterior + apical POP were then compared to define the additional effects of apical prolapse on LUTS. In order to asses; symptoms of urgency, urinary incontinence, stress urinary incontinence, frequency, abnormal emptying, hesitancy, interrupted stream, nocturia, post-micturition dribble, and dysuria were noted and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), and domains of Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 225 patients, 66 were excluded from the analysis due to accompanying posterior compartment defect. There was no statistically significant difference for age, systemic disease history, or smoking status between the groups (p > 0.05). However, history of traumatic vaginal delivery was significantly lower in the control group than in the other groups (p = 0.039). The prevalence of hesitancy and interrupted stream were found to be significantly higher in the anterior + apical POP group than in the isolated POP group (p<0.05). Obstructive subscale of the Urinary Distress Inventory was higher both in the isolated anterior POP and anterior + apical POP groups than the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that even minimal loss of apical support accompanying anterior prolapse exacerbates LUTS. © 2020 Elsevier Masson SASen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNo financial support received for this paper.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Masson s.r.l.en_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject(MeSH 2012): apical prolapseen_US
dc.subjectLower urinary tract symptomsen_US
dc.subjectPelvic organ prolapseen_US
dc.titleDoes apical prolapse in addition to early stage anterior prolapse have any effect on lower urinary tract symptoms?en_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorSivaslıoğlu, Akın
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101922
dc.relation.journalJournal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproductionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster