• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Fakülteler
  • Tıp Fakültesi
  • Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Fakülteler
  • Tıp Fakültesi
  • Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Active surveillance perspectives of radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and urologists in the treatment of prostate cancer

Date

2021

Author

Türkkan, Görkem
Alkan, Ali
Akarken, İlker
Tanrıverdi, Özgür
Şahin, Hayrettin

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Türkkan G, Alkan A, Akarken İ, Tanriverdi Ö, Şahin H. Active surveillance perspectives of radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and urologists in the treatment of prostate cancer. Turk Onkol Derg [Internet]. 2021;36(1):42-51. Available from: www.scopus.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the perspectives of radiation oncologists (ROs), medical oncologists (MOs) and urologists (UROs) towards active surveillance (AS) in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS A questionnaire with total of 24 questions was sent out via e-mail to the physicians. 244 participants completed the questionnaire. Pearson Chi square test and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify physicians’ characteristics and attitudes about AS. RESULTS There were 129 UROs (52.9%), 76 ROs (31.1%) and 39 MOs (16%) in the study population. The analysis of the important factors while considering AS showed that prostate cancer risk group (85.7%) was the most commonly considered criteria, followed by patient’s request and compliance (84.8%), life expectancy (76.2%) and sexual activity of the patient (34.8%). The AS was recommended by 86.8% of UROs, 77.6% of ROs and 61.6% of MOs (p=0.002). In multivariate analysis, practicing as ROs (p=0.031) or UROs (p<0.001), working in a reference hospital (p=0.006) and having an uro-oncology board (p=0.031) were found to be associated with more recommendations for AS. CONCLUSION More clinical experience and multi-disciplinary approach were associated with tendency of recommending AS. Educational sessions and uro-oncology board discussions may provide more integration of AS to our clinical practice routines.

Source

TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY

Volume

36

Issue

1

URI

http://onkder.org/text.php?&id=1184
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/9092

Collections

  • Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu [691]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6219]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6466]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Muğla

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Guide|| Instruction || Library || Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University || OAI-PMH ||

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Muğla:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.