Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorŞimşek, Cem
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Cansu
dc.contributor.authorKaralezli, Aylin
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T11:20:32Z
dc.date.available2022-11-07T11:20:32Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationŞimşek C, Kaya C, Karalezli A. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 28;52(5):318-323. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.22465. PMID: 36317802; PMCID: PMC9631500.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2147-2661 / 2149-8709
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/10368
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To assess the central corneal thickness (CCT) with 5 different devices, evaluate the repeatability of the devices, and determine the possible relationship between thickness values and sex. Materials and methods: The study included 308 eyes of 154 patients (76 women, 78 men) between the ages of 18-30 who presented to the Ophthalmology Clinic of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital. Autorefractor (Topcon, Japan), ultrasound pachymetry (UP) (Ceniscan, USA), high-resolution Pentacam (Oculus, USA), anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Optovue, USA), and Spectralis AS-OCT (Heidelberg, Germany) measurements were assessed. Results: The mean age of the study participants was 23.2±0.2 years and the mean CCT was 540±14.1 μm, with no statistically significant difference in CCT between sexes (p>0.05). Mean CCT values were 557.0±26.7 μm with the autorefractor, 543.6±32.9 μm with UP, 533.8±30.2 μm with the Oculus Pentacam, 519.8±30.1 μm with Optovue AS-OCT, and 547.5±31.6 μm with Heidelberg AS-OCT. Pairwise comparisons between devices showed that the Optovue AS-OCT gave significantly lower CCT measurements than the autorefractor and Heidelberg AS-OCT device (p=0.027 and p=0.033, respectively). The coefficient of repeatability for autorefractor, UP, high-resolution Pentacam, Optovue AS-OCT, and Heidelberg AS-OCT CCT measurements were 1.51%, 2.46%, 3.72%, 2.57%, and 3.34%, respectively. Conclusion: Measurements made with five different devices showed that CCT was comparable and clinically usable. However, it was determined that the Optovue AS-OCT showed lower CCT values compare to other devices. When compared in terms of repeatability, it was found to be lower in the Pentacam than other devices.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publishing Houseen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.22465en_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCentral corneal thicknessen_US
dc.subjectCorneaen_US
dc.subjectPachymetryen_US
dc.subjectOptical coherence tomographyen_US
dc.titleComparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetryen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-1316-4656en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorŞimşek, Cem
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKaya, Cansu
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKaralezli, Aylin
dc.identifier.volume52en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage318en_US
dc.identifier.endpage323en_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster