• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Meslek Yüksekokulları
  • Köyceğiz Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu
  • Sağlık Bakım Hizmetleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Meslek Yüksekokulları
  • Köyceğiz Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu
  • Sağlık Bakım Hizmetleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version of the revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam metin / Article (332.5Kb)

Date

2022

Author

Özkeskin, Mehmet
Özden, Fatih
Ocaker Aktan, Özg
Demirci Yildirim, Tuba
Sari, İsmail

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

ÖZKESKİN, MEHMET; ÖZDEN, FATİH; AKTAN, ÖZGE OCAKER; YILDIRIM, TUBA DEMİRCİ; and SARI, İSMAİL (2022) "Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version of the revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire in patients with ankylosing spondylitis," Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences: Vol. 52: No. 5, Article 36. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5516

Abstract

Background/aim: The revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire (RLDQ) is a unique assessment tool for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS); its comprehensive structure includes posture and neck flexibility parameters. The aim of the study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Turkish RLDQ in patients with AS. Materials and methods: A total of 100 AS patients were enrolled in the study. In the first evaluation, patients filled out the Dougados Functional Index (DFI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) in addition to RLDQ. Then, patients were refilled the revised RLDQ in the second assessment. Results: The mean age of the patients (40 women, 60 men) was 48.3 ± 12.6 years. The test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the RLDQ total score were excellent. ICC score and Cronbach’s alpha score were calculated as 0.853 and 0.905, respectively. The SEM and MDC values calculated for the RLDQ total score were 2.74 and 7.60, respectively. RLDQ had degrees of correlation with DFI, HAQ, and BASFI of 0.814, 0.742, and 0.852, respectively. Construct validity was excellent (r > 0.50, p < 0.01). Conclusion: The Turkish version of the RLDQ was found to be valid and reliable in patients with AS. It should be emphasized that the RLDQ is a distinctive and valuable tool that focuses separately on neck, posture, or other mobility parameters in the clinical assessment of AS.

Source

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

Volume

52

Issue

5

URI

https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5516
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/10379

Collections

  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2082]
  • Sağlık Bakım Hizmetleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu [91]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6219]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Muğla

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Guide|| Instruction || Library || Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University || OAI-PMH ||

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Muğla:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.