Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÇetinkaya, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorÖnem, Kadir
dc.contributor.authorRifaioğlu, Mehmet Murat
dc.contributor.authorYalçın, Veli
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T15:04:49Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T15:04:49Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1735-1308
dc.identifier.issn1735-546X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/2934
dc.descriptionWOS: 000366345600010en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 26571321en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: We compared the effectiveness and complications of 980-nm diode laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods: In total, 72 consecutive patients with BPH entered the study. All patients underwent general and urological evaluations. The primary outcome was improvement in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). The secondary outcomes were IPSS quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), residual volume, and complications. Patients were allocated randomly to the TURP and laser groups. The Ceralas HPD120, a diode laser system emitting at a wavelength of 980 nm, was used for photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP). TURP was performed with a monopolar 26 French resectoscope. Preoperative and operative parameters and surgical outcomes were compared. Results: In total, 36 patients in each group underwent PVP and TURP. The mean age standard deviation was 63.1 +/- 9.1 years and 64.7 +/- 10.2 years in the PVP and TURP groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in age, prostate size, prostate-specific antigen concentration, Qmax, preoperative IPSS, or preoperative Qmax between the two groups. The operation duration was also similar between the groups (P =.36). The catheterization time was 1.45 +/- 0.75 and 2.63 +/- 0.49 days in the PVP and TURP groups, respectively (P <.01). The PVP group had a shorter hospital stay than the TURP group. The 3-month postoperative Qmax increased to 9.90 +/- 3.61 and 6.59 +/- 6.06 mL/s from baseline in the TURP and PVP groups, respectively; there was no difference in the increases between the groups (P =.08). The IPSS and IPSS-QoL were significantly improved with the operation (P <.01), and this improvement was similar in both groups P=.3 and P=.8, respectively. The complication rate was also similar between the two groups. Conclusions: PVP with a diode laser is as safe and effective as TURP in the treatment of BPH, and the techniques have similar complication rates and functional results. PVP has the advantage of shorter hospitalization and catheter indwelling times and no need for discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUrol & Nephrol Res Ctr-Unrcen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAblation Techniquesen_US
dc.subjectLasersen_US
dc.subjectSemiconductoren_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic Useen_US
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectTransurethral Resection of Prostateen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Bladder Neck Obstructionen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Catheterizationen_US
dc.title980-Nm Diode Laser Vaporization versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Controlled Studyen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇetinkaya, Mehmet
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2355en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2361en_US
dc.relation.journalUrology Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster