Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAladağ, Akın
dc.contributor.authorŞahan, Makbule Heval
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir Akkus, Niler
dc.contributor.authorTüzünsoy Aktaş, Rahime
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T14:39:21Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T14:39:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_590_19
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/382
dc.descriptionWOS: 000565286100008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 32788484en_US
dc.description.abstractAims: The aim of this study was to compare the retention of different luting agents used with implant-supported restorations. Materials and Methods: A total of 90 custom metal frameworks and copings were prepared and divided into six different luting agent groups (n = 15/group): polycarboxylate cement (PC), resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC), two self-adhesive resin cements (SARC), copper-ion zinc-phosphate cement (CZPC), and non-eugenol temporary resin cement (TRC). After sandblasting with 50 mu m Al2O3, the copings were cemented on frameworks and stored in artificial saliva for 48 h at 37 degrees C and thermocycled between 5-55 degrees C for 37,500 cycles. Samples were subjected to tensile testing by a universal testing machine, and data were statistically analyzed. Results: The differences between the retention values of types of cement were significant (P < 0.05). The maximum retention value was calculated for CZPC (755,12 +/- 55 MPa) while the lowest value was for TRC (311,7 +/- 61 Mpa). Conclusion: Neither of the tested cement had superiority over another to ensuring retention. The types of cement presented were meant to be a discretionary guide for the clinician in deciding the amount of the desired retention between castings and abutments.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCemented Abutmentsen_US
dc.subjectFixed Prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectRestoration Removalen_US
dc.titleRetention of luting agents used for implant-supported restorations: A comparative In-Vitro studyen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü, Protetik Diş Tedavisien_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAladağ, Akın
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/njcp.njcp_590_19
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1073en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1078en_US
dc.relation.journalNigerian Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster