Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorElgin, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T16:34:38Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T16:34:38Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.isbn978-90-481-9114-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_16
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/4683
dc.descriptionConference on Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective - DEC 18-20, 2008 - Univ Vienna, Vienna, AUSTRIAen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000281053400017en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I argue that the multiple realizability argument against reductionism does not work in biochemistry and that biochemistry as a reductionist project is a progressive research program. Since the anti-reductionist argument that appeals to the multiple realizability thesis doesn't work and since biochemistry that incorporates the principle that biological functions of biomolecules in living cells can be understood in terms of chemical and physical properties of those molecules is a progressive research program, I conclude that plausibility of reductionism is still worthy of further study.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipVienna Circle Insten_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag Berlinen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhilosophy of Science in a European Perspective
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleREDUCTIONISM IN BIOLOGY: AN EXAMPLE OF BIOCHEMISTRYen_US
dc.item-typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorElgin, Mehmet
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_16
dc.identifier.volume1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage195en_US
dc.identifier.endpage203en_US
dc.relation.journalPresent Situation in the Philosophy of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record