• Türkçe
    • English
  • Türkçe 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Giriş
Öğe Göster 
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • Öğe Göster
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • Öğe Göster
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Continuous adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty provides a better analgesia compared to single shot: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Tarih

2019

Yazar

Canbek, Umut
Akgun, Ulas
Aydogan, Nevres Hurriyet
Kilinc, Cem Yalin
Uysal, Ali Ihsan

Üst veri

Tüm öğe kaydını göster

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare single-shot adductor canal block and continuous infusion adductor canal block techniques in total knee arthroplasty patients. Methods: We prospectively randomized 123 patients who were scheduled for unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty surgery into single shot (n = 60; mean age: 67.1 +/- 6.9 years) and continuous (n = 63; mean age: 66.9 +/- 6.8 years) adductor canal block groups. Postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, need for additional opioids and functional results as; timed up and go test, the 30-s chair stand test, 5 times sit-to-stand test, the 6-min walking test, the time to active straight leg raise, time to walking upstairs, maximal flexion at the time of discharge, duration of stay in hospital were compared between the two groups. Results: Pain scores were lower in the continuous adductor canal block group as compared to the single-shot adductor canal block group throughout the postoperative period (p = 0.001). Rescue analgesia was required for 6 (10%) patients in the single shot group and for 1 (1.59%) patient in the continuous group (p = 0.044). Patients in the continuous adductor canal block group displayed better functional results than the single-shot adductor canal block group with respect to active straight-leg rise time (25.52 +/- 4.56 h vs 30.47 +/- 8.07 h, p = 0.001), 6-min walking test (74.52 +/- 29.38 m vs 62.18 +/- 33.32 m, p = 0.035) and maximal knee flexion degree at discharge (104.92 +/- 5.35 degrees vs 98.5 +/- 7.55 degrees, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups for other functional and ambulation scores. Conclusion: Pain control following total knee arthroplasty was found to be better in those patients treated with continuous adductor canal block as compared to those treated with single-shot adductor canal block. Patients treated with continuous adductor canal block also displayed better ambulation and functional recovery following total knee arthroplasty. (C) 2019 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

Kaynak

Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica

Cilt

53

Sayı

5

Bağlantı

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.04.001
https://app.trdizin.gov.tr//makale/TXpNeE5UazVPUT09
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/869

Koleksiyonlar

  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2082]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6219]
  • TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [3005]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6466]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Politika | Rehber | İletişim |

DSpace@Muğla

by OpenAIRE
Gelişmiş Arama

sherpa/romeo

Göz at

Tüm DSpaceBölümler & KoleksiyonlarTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreDile GöreBölüme GöreKategoriye GöreYayıncıya GöreErişim ŞekliKurum Yazarına GöreBu KoleksiyonTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreDile GöreBölüme GöreKategoriye GöreYayıncıya GöreErişim ŞekliKurum Yazarına Göre

Hesabım

GirişKayıt

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Politika || Rehber|| Yönerge || Kütüphane || Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi || OAI-PMH ||

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Muğla, Türkiye
İçerikte herhangi bir hata görürseniz, lütfen bildiriniz:

Creative Commons License
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Muğla:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.