Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGürel, Barış
dc.contributor.authorKeçebaş, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAkkaya, Volkan Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorGöltaş, Merve
dc.contributor.authorKurtuluş, Karani
dc.contributor.authorGüler, Onur Vahip
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-13T13:40:31Z
dc.date.available2022-12-13T13:40:31Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationGürel, B., A. Keçebaş, V. R. Akkaya, M. Göltaş, K. Kurtuluş, and O. V. Güler. 2021. "COMPARATIVE THERMAL AND FLOW ANALYSES OF TWO DIFFERENT PLATE PATTERNS FOR A COMPACT PLATE HEAT EXCHANGERen_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-300070686-8
dc.identifier.issn27097609
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/10441
dc.description.abstractIt is known that the most significant difference of plate heat exchangers (PHEs) from other heat exchangers (HEs) is their heat transfer efficiency. The thinness of the plates separating the two fluids compared to the other HEs increases the heat transfer rate and decreases the heat losses that will occur during the transfer. Since heat rejection is an essential part of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems, all improvements on heat transfer will lead higher efficiencies. The aim of the study is to increase the efficiency of PHEs. In this study, two different compact PHE prototypes with trachea pattern and fish gill pattern are created by taking inspiration from nature. HEs are made up of three plates each. PHEs are numerically analyzed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Temperature and pressure contours are taken for both the hot and cold sides, and the convective heat transfer coefficient, Reynold's number, Prandtl number, effectiveness and entropy generation are calculated. The results obtained are compared. The heat transfer amount for the trachea patterned PHE was 2800W, entropy production 27.07W/K, effectiveness 0.26, while for the fish gill pattern PHE, these values are obtained as 1881W, 20.26W/K and 0.18, respectively. It has been observed that the trachea pattern PHE is better in increasing the amount of heat transfer compared to the fish gill pattern PHE.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKnowledge Center on Organic Rankine Cycle Technology (KCORC)en_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectHeat exchangersen_US
dc.titleCOMPARATIVE THERMAL AND FLOW ANALYSES OF TWO DIFFERENT PLATE PATTERNS FOR A COMPACT PLATE HEAT EXCHANGERen_US
dc.item-typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Teknoloji Fakültesi, Enerji Sistemleri Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-4809-2461en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-5052-8554en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-0910-1743en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKeçebaş, Ali
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAkkaya, Volkan Ramazan
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGöltaş, Merve
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGüler, Onur Vahip
dc.relation.journal6th International Seminar on ORC Power Systems, ORC 2021en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster