Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGürelik, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorSül, Sabahattin
dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Gaye
dc.contributor.authorÖzsaygılı, Cemal
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T14:51:47Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T14:51:47Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2325-8160
dc.identifier.issn2325-8179
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20170928-03
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/1806
dc.descriptionWOS: 000416073000003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 29020422en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of a new surgical technique on the closure of persistent large macular holes (MHs) PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for 10 eyes of 10 patients who underwent surgical intervention for the treatment of large and persistent MHs were reviewed retrospectively. After entrance of the three-port transconjunctival 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy instruments, a shallow perihole retinal detachment was formed by injecting a small amount of fluid with a 39-gauge /41-gauge subretinal cannula under the perihole (superior, temporal, and inferior sparing nasal bundle fibers) retina. Edges of the hole were brought closer with small, passive aspirations by a silicone-tipped cannula. After fluid-air exchange, a 39- gauge /41-gauge cannula was placed over the hole to remove submacular fluid. Then air was changed with 20% sulfur hexafluoride endotamponade. RESULTS: Mean minimum hole diameter was 691 mu m +/- 98 mu m (range: 500 mu m to 812 mu m), and mean basal diameter was 1,604 mu m +/- 321 mu m (range: 1,066 mu m to 2,200 mu m). Preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuities (BSCVAs) were lower than 20/200 in eight patients and were 20/200 in two patients. MHs were successfully closed in all eyes (100%). BSCVA did not change in two patients and were lower than 20/200. BSCVAs were 20/200 in six patients and greater than 20/200 in two patients. The ellipsoid zone (EZ) was lost in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: All the large and persistent MHs were successfully closed and stayed closed during follow-up period. However, increase in visual acuities was limited, which was related to the loss of the EZ. The authors' modified technique seems to be a good option for the surgical treatment of large and persistent MHs.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSlack Incen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleA Modified Foveal Advancement Technique in the Treatment of Persistent Large Macular Holesen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorSül, Sabahattin
dc.identifier.doi10.3928/23258160-20170928-03
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.startpage793en_US
dc.identifier.endpage798en_US
dc.relation.journalOphthalmic Surgery Lasers & Imaging Retinaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster