Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTarkan, Ali Serhan
dc.contributor.authorVilizzi, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorTop, Nildeniz
dc.contributor.authorEkmekci, Fitnat Güler
dc.contributor.authorStebbing, Paul D.
dc.contributor.authorCopp, Gordon H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T14:52:58Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T14:52:58Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1434-2944
dc.identifier.issn1522-2632
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201601877
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/1971
dc.description0000-0001-8628-0514en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000403142100005en_US
dc.description.abstractScreening tools are being increasingly used to identify more effectively non-native species that pose an elevated risk of being invasive. Of the available decision-support tools, the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) has been widely used, but has recently been replaced by a generic screening tool, the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK), which is applicable to any aquatic species and complies with the minimum requirements for risk tools under the new EC alien invasive species Regulation. With its unique zoogeography and rich native fauna, Turkey is highly susceptible to non-native species' introductions and translocations. In order to inform non-native species policy and management regarding fishes in Turkey, AS-ISK was used to re-assess species previously screened using FISK and to assess additional non-native and translocated fish species. In this first calibration study of AS-ISK for Turkey, a basic score threshold of 28 was achieved, which reliably distinguished between potentially invasive (high risk) and potentially non-invasive (medium to low risk) fishes. Of the 64 species assessed, only one was ranked as 'low risk', 40 were categorised as 'medium risk', and the remaining 23 as 'high risk' of which five were translocated. Non-native species currently not present in Turkey, but that pose a high risk of being invasive, were Ameiurus melas, Ameiurus nebulosus, Hemiculter leucisculus, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Micropterus salmoides, Perccottus glenii, Pimephales promelas; whereas, the highest scoring translocated species were Cyprinus carpio, Esox lucius and Silurus glanis. When the potential effects of climate change on the assessments were considered, risk scores increased for some (sub) tropical fishes of which two are translocated species.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific & Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)Turkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) [115Y181]; UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and a Cefas Seedcorn [DP372]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific & Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), Grant number: 115Y181; UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and a Cefas Seedcorn, Grant number: DP372en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnatoliaen_US
dc.subjectFISKen_US
dc.subjectIntroduced Speciesen_US
dc.subjectNon-Indigenousen_US
dc.subjectNon-Nativeen_US
dc.subjectThraceen_US
dc.titleIdentification of potentially invasive freshwater fishes, including translocated species, in Turkey using the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK)en_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Su Ürünleri Fakültesi, Su Ürünleri Temel Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorTarkan, Ali Serhan
dc.contributor.institutionauthorTop, Nildeniz
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/iroh.201601877
dc.identifier.volume102en_US
dc.identifier.issue1-2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage47en_US
dc.identifier.endpage56en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Review of Hydrobiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster