Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖzyol, Pelin
dc.contributor.authorÖzyol, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorBaldemir, Ercan
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T14:55:28Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T14:55:28Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0002-9394
dc.identifier.issn1879-1891
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.032
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/2239
dc.descriptionWOS: 000389870100011en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 27702623en_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Age-related changes in lens elasticity and ciliary muscle contractility can affect how ocular parameters respond to cycloplegia, and therefore intraocular lens (IOL) power measurements calculated by formulas using anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), or white-to-white (WtW) for effective lens position prediction can vary. In response, using swept-source optical biometry in prepresbyopic and presbyopic eyes, we investigated changes in ocular parameters and IOL power calculations attributable to cycloplegia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: In 38 prepresbyopic and 42 presbyopic eyes, we measured pupil diameter, radius of corneal curvature values, central corneal thickness, WtW, ACD, LT, and axial length both before and after cycloplegia. We determined IOL power calculations with the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/theoretical, Holladay 2, and Haigis formulas. To pinpoint the effect of cycloplegia, we recorded refractive predictions in pre- and postdilation conditions according to the same IOL power calculations, even if postdilation IOL power calculations had changed. RESULTS: With cycloplegia, pupil diameter changed significantly more in presbyopic eyes (P < .001). Central corneal thickness decreased in prepresbyopic eyes (P = .048), whereas WtW increased in presbyopic eyes (P = .02). In both groups, ACD and LT changed significantly (P < .001). IOL power calculations according to the Holladay 2 formula differed in prepresbyopic eyes (P = .042), and refractive predictions with the Holladay 2 and Haigis formulas differed significantly in prepresbyopic eyes (P = .043 and P = .022, respectively). CONCLUSION: Surgeons should consider the effect of cycloplegia on refractive prediction errors and IOL power calculations determined with Haigis and Holladay 2 formulas, especially in prepresbyopic ages. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOcular Parametersen_US
dc.titleChanges in Ocular Parameters and lntraocular Lens Powers in Aging Cycloplegic Eyesen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesien_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖzyol, Pelin
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖzyol, Erhan
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.032
dc.identifier.volume173en_US
dc.identifier.startpage76en_US
dc.identifier.endpage83en_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster