Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorElgin, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorSober, Elliott
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T15:06:42Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T15:06:42Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0004-8402
dc.identifier.issn1471-6828
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2014.948022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/3161
dc.descriptionWOS: 000348853900001en_US
dc.description.abstractSober [2011] argues that some causal statements are a priori true and that a priori causal truths are central to explanations in the theory of natural selection. Lange and Rosenberg [2011] criticize Sober's argument. They concede that there are a priori causal truths, but maintain that those truths are only 'minimally causal'. They also argue that explanations that are built around a priori causal truths are not causal explanations, properly speaking. Here we criticize both of Lange and Rosenberg's claims.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleCausal, A Priori True, and Explanatory: A Reply to Lange and Rosenbergen_US
dc.item-typeeditorialen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorElgin, Mehmet
dc.contributor.institutionauthorSober, Elliott
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00048402.2014.948022
dc.identifier.volume93en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage167en_US
dc.identifier.endpage171en_US
dc.relation.journalAustralasian Journal of Philosophyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster