Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDeliktas, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorYapici, Onur
dc.contributor.authorOzen, Utku
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Engin
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Hayrettin
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T16:18:05Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T16:18:05Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1735-1308
dc.identifier.issn1735-546X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/3471
dc.descriptionDeliktas, Hasan/0000-0002-0973-2318;en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000338908800003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25015599en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the success and complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) operations and to determine the effect of postoperative late removal of an open-end ureter catheter on hospital stay and on secondary interventions. Materials and Methods: The records of 198 patients (97 female, 101 male) who had PNL between May 2009 and February 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The open-end ureter catheter which was placed during the operation was removed at the end of the operation in the first 53 patients ( group 1) and 12 hours after the nephrostomy catheter in 145 patients ( group 2). Results: PNL intervention was performed in 198 patients with a mean age of 40.83 +/- 13.64 years and mean stone load of 9.82 +/- 5.37 cm(2) (range 2 to 26 cm2). When clinically insignificant stone pieces <4 mm were accepted as successful, the total success rate was 80.80% (79.2% in group1 and 81.4% in group 2, P = .50). The hospitalization period was significantly reduced in group 2 (3.45 +/- 0.95 days vs. 2.61 +/- 0.65 days; P = .006). While secondary surgical intervention was not necessary in any of the patients in group 2 (0.0%), but 4 patients (7.5%) required ureterorenoscopy plus double-J stent placement following the primary procedure in group 1 (P = .006). Conclusion: PNL is a safe procedure with a high success rate and a short hospitalization period. There was a significant decrease in the hospitalization period and secondary surgical intervention rates with the postoperative late removal of the open-end ureter catheter.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUrol & Nephrol Res Ctr-Unrcen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKidney Calculien_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectNephrostomyen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneousen_US
dc.subjectMethodsen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectNephrolithiasisen_US
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.titleCan We Reduce Secondary Surgical Interventions and Length of Hospitalization in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?en_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentTemp[Deliktas, Hasan; Sahin, Hayrettin] Mugla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Mugla, Turkey -- [Yapici, Onur; Ozen, Utku; Yalcin, Engin] Sehitkamil State Hosp, Dept Urol, Gaziantep, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1563en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1568en_US
dc.relation.journalUrology Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster