• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Microhabitat Distribution of Pseudodactylogyrus anguillae (Monogenea), Ergasilus gibbus and Ergasilus lizae (Copepoda) on the Gills of European Eels (Anguilla anguilla, L.)

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam metin / Full text (334.3Kb)

Date

2013

Author

Soylu, Erhan
Çolak, Sibel Özesen
Erdoğan, Fatime
Erdoğan, Mete
Tektas, Necla

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

Microhabitat distribution of Pseudodactylogyrus anguillae (Yin & Sproston, 1948) Gussev, 1965 (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae), Ergasilus gibbus von Nordman, 1832 and Ergasilus lizae Kroyer, 1863 (Copepoda: Ergasilidae) was studied on the gills of European eel Anguilla anguilla from Lake Koycegiz-Dalyan, Estuarine Channel System, Turkey. A total of 69 A. anguilla were examined between December 2009 and March 2010. A total of 1421 P anguillae, 143 E. gibbus and 63 E. lizae specimens were collected from the fish host. A prevalence of 81.15% and mean infection intensity of 25.16 for P anguillae, 50.72%, 4.0 for E. gibbus and 27.53%, 3.31 for E. lizae were found. Gill arches II, III, IV were preferred by P anguillae, gill arches I, II, III by E. gibbus and gill arches III, IV by E. lizae. In general occurrence of the parasite species, P anguillae preferred proximal-dorsal segments, E. gibbus distal-dorsal segments, whereas E. lizae exhibited a rather homogenous distribution. Site of attachment was the inner surface of the gill arches for E. gibbus and the outer surface for E. lizae. P. anguillae was found mostly on the inner surface of the hemibranches. Bispecific infections of P. anguillae with E. gibbus and E. lizae were also analysed individually. Finally, single species infections of the three parasite species were analysed.

Source

Acta Zoologica Bulgarica

Volume

65

Issue

2

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/3790

Collections

  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6219]
  • Su Ürünleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu [16]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6466]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Muğla

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Guide|| Instruction || Library || Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University || OAI-PMH ||

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Muğla:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.