Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorPetros, Peter
dc.contributor.authorSivaslıoğlu, Ahmet Akın
dc.contributor.authorBratila, Elvira
dc.contributor.authorBratila, Petre
dc.contributor.authorAbendstein, Burghard
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T14:39:27Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T14:39:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0937-3462
dc.identifier.issn1433-3023
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04350-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/446
dc.descriptionBRATILA, Elvira/0000-0002-2979-3433; Petros, Peter/0000-0002-9611-3258en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000541222300003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 32556409en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and hypothesis This study emanates from the ISPP OASIS and fecal incontinence study group at the 2018 annual meeting of the International Society for Pelviperineology (ISPP) in Bucharest, Romania. The aim was to analyze the biomechanical factors leading to the breakdown of anal sphincter repair and to suggest a more robust technique for external anal sphincter (EAS) repair. Methods Our starting point was what happens to the EAS wound repair site during defecation following EAS repair, with special reference to the process of wound healing. Results We concluded that a graft no more than 1 x 1.5 cm sutured across the EAS tear line would mechanically support the tear line, vastly reduce the internal centrifugal forces acting on it during defecation, thereby giving the wound time to heal. Three different grafts were discussed, autologous, biological, and mesh. Also analyzed were the effects on EAS muscle contractility of overly tight repair and overly loose sphincter repair, the latter occasioned by the tearing out of sutures and repair by secondary intention. Conclusions We have analyzed causes of sphincter repair failure, introduced a graft method, preferably autologous, for the prevention thereof and supported ultrasound assessment, rather than the absence of fecal incontinence as the criterion for success of EAS repair. Although based on well-established biomechanical principles, our proposal at this stage remains unproven. Our hope is that these concepts will be challenged, clarified, and tested, preferably in a randomized controlled trial.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer London Ltden_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOASISen_US
dc.subjectAnal Sphincter Tearsen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectAutologousen_US
dc.subjectGraften_US
dc.titleA biomechanically based concept for a stronger obstetric anal sphincter repairen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorSivaslıoğlu, Ahmet Akın
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00192-020-04350-0
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2399en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2403en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Urogynecology Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster