Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTural, D.
dc.contributor.authorÖlmez, Ö.F.
dc.contributor.authorSümbül, A.T.
dc.contributor.authorArtaç, M.
dc.contributor.authorÖzhan, N.
dc.contributor.authorAkar, E.
dc.contributor.authorKılıçkap, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T17:17:09Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T17:17:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2405-4569
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.09.010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/6287
dc.description.abstractBackground: Atezolizumab (ATZ) has demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in previous studies in patients with locally advanced or metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma. Objective: To compare the real-life experience and data of clinical trials on ATZ treatment in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Design, setting, and participants: Patients with urothelial cancer treated with ATZ after progression on first-line chemotherapy from an expanded access program were retrospectively studied. Data of patients were obtained from their files and hospital records. Safety was evaluated for patients treated with at least one cycle of ATZ. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, and safety profile of patients. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate median follow-up and estimate PFS and OS. Results and limitations: Data of 115 enrolled patients were analyzed. Most of the patients (92.3%, n = 106) had received chemotherapy regimen only once prior to ATZ. The median follow-up duration was 23.5 mo. The complete response rate, partial response rate, and ORR were 8.7% (n = 10), 20.0% (n = 23), and 28.7% (n = 33), respectively. The median duration of response was 20.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.47–28.8). Of the 33 patients who responded to treatment, 60% (n = 20) had an ongoing response at the time of the analysis. PFS and OS with ATZ were 3.8 mo (95% CI, 2.25–5.49) and 9.8 mo (95% CI, 6.7–12.9), respectively. All-cause and any-grade adverse events were observed in 113 (98%) patients. Of the patients, 64% experienced a treatment-related adverse event of any grade and 24 (21.2%) had a grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse event. Limitations of the study included its retrospective design, and determination of treatment response based on clinical notes and local radiographic studies. Conclusions: In these real-life data, ATZ was effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. ATZ is an effective and tolerable treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma in our study, similar to previously reported trials. Patient summary: Atezolizumab is effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who progressed with first-line chemotherapy, consistent with the outcomes of the previous clinical trials in this setting. Atezolizumab is an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with urothelial cancer after progression by the chemotherapy. Clinical activity and safety of atezolizumab treatment in real-life patients were consistent with the outcomes of the previous clinical trials in this setting © 2020en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAtezolizumaben_US
dc.subjectBladder canceren_US
dc.subjectImmunotherapyen_US
dc.subjectUrothelial carcinomaen_US
dc.titleAtezolizumab in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Have Progressed After First-line Chemotherapy: Results of Real-life Experiencesen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentTempTural, D., Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ölmez, Ö.F., Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Sümbül, A.T., Medical Faculty, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey; Artaç, M., Medical Faculty, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram, Konya, Turkey; Özhan, N., Medical Faculty, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey; Akar, E., Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Çakar, B., Medical Faculty, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey; Köstek, O., Medical Faculty, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey; Ekenel, M., Istanbul University Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey; Erman, M., Medical Faculty, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey; Coşkun, H.Ş., Medical Faculty, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey; Selçukbiricik, F., Medical Faculty, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey; Keskin, Ö., Medical Faculty, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey; Türköz, F.P., MedicalPark Goztepe Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Oruç, K., Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey; Bayram, S., Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey; Yılmaz, U., MedicalPark Izmir Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Bilgetekin, İ., Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara OncologyTraining and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Yıldız, B., Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Şendur, M.A.N., Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; Paksoy, N., Istanbul University Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey; Dirican, A., Medical Faculty, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey; Erdem, D., MedicalPark Samsun Hospital, Samsun, Turkey; Selam, M., Liv Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Tanrıverdi, Ö., Medical Faculty, Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey; Paydaş, S., Medical Faculty, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey; Urakçı, Z., Medical Faculty, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Atağ, E., Medical Faculty, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey; Güncan, S., Medical Faculty, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey; Ürün, Y., Medical Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey; Alkan, A., Osmaniye State Hospital, Osmaniye, Turkey; Kaya, A.O., Medicana Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Özyükseler, D.T., Istanbul Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Taşkaynatan, H., Katip Celebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Yıldırım, M., MedicalPark Gaziantep Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Sönmez, M., Ordu State Hospital, Ordu, Turkey; Başoğlu, T., Medical Faculty, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey; Gündüz, Ş., Antalya Memorial Hospital, Antalya, Turkey; Kılıçkap, S., Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.euf.2020.09.010
dc.relation.journalEuropean Urology Focusen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster