Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSimsek, O.
dc.contributor.authorBelli, A.K.
dc.contributor.authorAydogan, F.
dc.contributor.authorKaratas, A.
dc.contributor.authorCanbay, E.
dc.contributor.authorKepil, N.
dc.contributor.authorUras, C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T17:17:17Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T17:17:17Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0003-1348
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/6361
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 30606355en_US
dc.description.abstractSentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the main method in staging the axilla. There are insufficient data available regarding the accuracy of an SLN biopsy in male breast cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the combination of dye and radiotracer would improve the detection rate of SLNs versus dye alone in male breast cancer patients. FromFebruary 2009 to January 2012, our SLN biopsy database was retrospectively reviewed to identify male breast cancer cases. Of the 890 SLN procedures contained in the database, 10 male breast cancer patients were identified. Patient age, body mass index, SLN biopsy technique, SLN identification, number of SLN excised, and pathology reports were reviewed. Mean age was 57.2 (34-85) years with a mean tumor size was 2.2 (1.0-4.0) cm. SLN detection ratios were two in four with blue dye and six in six with the combination technique. Overall, SLNs were identified in 8 of the 10 patients. SLN biopsy is applicable in male breast cancer cases. The addition of a radiotracer to the dye in SLN biopsy increases the detection rate of sentinel nodes in male breast cancer patients. © 2018 American Surgeon. All Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSoutheastern Surgical Congressen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleCombination technique is superior to dye alone in identification of the sentinel lymph node in male breast canceren_US
dc.item-typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.contributor.departmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentTempSimsek, O., Department of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Cerrahpasa Tip Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dali, Kocamustafapasxa, Istanbul, Turkey; Belli, A.K., Department of General Surgery, Mugla Sitki Kocman Medical School, Mugla, Turkey; Aydogan, F., Department of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Cerrahpasa Tip Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dali, Kocamustafapasxa, Istanbul, Turkey; Karatas, A., Department of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Cerrahpasa Tip Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dali, Kocamustafapasxa, Istanbul, Turkey; Canbay, E., Department of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Cerrahpasa Tip Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dali, Kocamustafapasxa, Istanbul, Turkey; Kepil, N., Department of Pathology, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey; Selcukbiricik, F., Department of Medical Oncology, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Celik, V., Department of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Cerrahpasa Tip Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dali, Kocamustafapasxa, Istanbul, Turkey; Uras, C., Department of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Cerrahpasa Tip Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dali, Kocamustafapasxa, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume84en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1957en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1960en_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Surgeonen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster