Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaralezli, Nazım
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T14:40:59Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T14:40:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1753-1934
dc.identifier.issn2043-6289
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419846755
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/852
dc.descriptionWOS: 000485297900021en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 31500528en_US
dc.description.abstractevidence, and ignored level IV evidence. The benefits of the true active motion have been clearly observed and reported in the leading centers of flexor tendon repair around the world with large series of level IV evidence (Giesen et al., 2018; Higgins et al., 2010; Lalonde, 2013; 2017; Khor et al., 2016; Moriya et al., 2017; 2019; Reissner et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2017, Tang, 2018, Zhou et al., 2017). Observations of flexor tendon repair with WALANT and the improved results obtained by the surgeons demonstrated in the large series using true active movement leave me convinced that it is only a matter of time that level III evidence will surface which proves that true active movement is superior to full fist place and hold regimes.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltden_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectLetteren_US
dc.titleOur tenolysis rate after zone 2 flexor tendon repairs and modified Duran passive motion protocol over the past 3 yearsen_US
dc.item-typeletteren_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKaralezli, Nazım
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1753193419846755
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage867en_US
dc.identifier.endpage868en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Hand Surgery-European Volumeen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster