Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖzkaraca, Osman
dc.contributor.authorKeçebaş, Ali
dc.contributor.authorDemircan, Cihan
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T14:49:57Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T14:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442
dc.identifier.issn1873-6785
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.095
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/1412
dc.description0000-0002-0964-8757en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000437073600015en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the thermodynamic performance of a binary geothermal power plant (GPP) is comparatively evaluated using the exergy analysis and optimization method. Thus, in addition to routes to improve the thermodynamic performance of the system, the thermodynamic relationships between the system components and improvement performances of the components are determined. With this aim, the Sinem GPP located in Aydin province in Turkey as a real system is selected. All data from the system are collected and a numerical model simulating the real system is developed. On the developed model, the conventional and advanced exergy analyses for exergy analysis and the artificial bee colony (ABC) method for optimization process are performed. The results of the study show that total exergy efficiencies of the conventional exergy analysis, advanced exergy analysis and artificial bee colony are determined as 39.1%, 43.1% and 42.8%, respectively. The exergy efficiency obtained from advanced exergy analysis is higher compared to the other two methods. This is due to the fact that theoretical and unavoidable operation assumptions in advanced exergy analysis are arbitrary as a single value depending on the decision maker. However, decision variables in the ABC method are within certain constraints chosen by the decision maker. It is better to select constraint limits instead of an arbitrary single value selection. Therefore, its arbitrary values should be confirmed with any optimization method. Additionally, the highest exergy destruction identified in the three methods is occurred in heat exchangers as the condenser and vaporizer. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMaren Geothermal Inc.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided for the present work by the Maren Geothermal Inc. and the personal support of, Mr. Ertan Turk. The authors are very grateful to the reviewers due their appropriate and constructive suggestions as well as their proposed corrections, which have been utilized in improving the quality of the paper.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGeothermal Power Planten_US
dc.subjectThermal Performance Improvementen_US
dc.subjectOptimizationen_US
dc.subjectAdvanced Exergy Analysisen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Bee Colonyen_US
dc.titleComparative thermodynamic evaluation of a geothermal power plant by using the advanced exergy and artificial bee colony methodsen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Teknoloji Fakültesi, Enerji Sistemleri Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖzkaraca, Osman
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKeçebaş, Ali
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.095
dc.identifier.volume156en_US
dc.identifier.startpage169en_US
dc.identifier.endpage180en_US
dc.relation.journalEnergyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster