Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDibek Mısırlıoğlu, Emine
dc.contributor.authorVezir, Emine
dc.contributor.authorToyran, Müge
dc.contributor.authorÇapanoğlu, Murat
dc.contributor.authorGüvenir, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorCivelek, Ersoy
dc.contributor.authorKocabaş, Can Naci
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T14:55:16Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T14:55:16Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1088-5412
dc.identifier.issn1539-6304
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2017.38.4009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/2221
dc.descriptionWOS: 000396371700008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 28052800en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Anaphylaxis is increasingly reported in infancy. Diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis is difficult, and data are limited in infants. The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical course and management strategies used for anaphylaxis in infancy. Methods: Patients attending to our clinic and who had anaphylaxis under 2 years old were evaluated. Sixty-three patients were enrolled for the study. The mean +/- standard deviation age was 10.6 +/- 6.1 months (median, 11 months). Results: Anaphylaxis occurred at home in 48 infants (76.2%). Food was the most common causative agent (n +/- 52 [82.5%]), with cow's milk (n +/- 21 [40.4%]) and egg white (n +/- 13 [25%]) being the most frequent. Medication was the other causative agent (n +/- 9 [14.3%]), with antibiotics being the most frequent (n +/- 6 [66.7%]). The clinical manifestations were cutaneous (95.2%) and respiratory symptoms (79.4%). The median time lapse between contact and onset of symptoms was 10 minutes (5-15 minutes) (median, interquartile range [IQR] 25-75%). The total duration of symptoms was 2 hours (0.5-3 hours) (median, IQR 25-75%). Six patients had mild (9.5%), 40 moderate (63.5%), and 17 severe (27%) symptoms. A biphasic course was noticed in two infants (3.2%), with a symptom-free interval between a minimum of 30 minutes and a maximum of 4 hours. Forty-three (68.3%) received H-1 antihistamines, 31 received corticosteroids (49.2%), and 23 received adrenaline (36.5%). Only one patient needed intensive care. Conclusion: This study provided detailed clinical information in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis in infants. Diagnosing and managing anaphylaxis are difficult in infancy. Arrangements for definition of symptoms should be made in the new anaphylaxis guidelines.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOcean Side Publications Incen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnaphylaxis in infancyen_US
dc.titleClinical diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis in infancyen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKocabaş, Can Naci
dc.identifier.doi10.2500/aap.2017.38.4009
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage38en_US
dc.identifier.endpage43en_US
dc.relation.journalAllergy and Asthma Proceedingsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster