Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorHidisoğlu, Enis
dc.contributor.authorGök, Deniz Kantar
dc.contributor.authorEr, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorAkpınar, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorAkkoyunlu, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorYargıçoğlu, Piraye
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T15:02:39Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T15:02:39Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0006-8993
dc.identifier.issn1872-6240
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/2560
dc.descriptionWOS: 000372689600001en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 26776477en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study was to investigate the duration effects of 2100-MHz electromagnetic field (EMF) on visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and to assess lipid peroxidation (LPO), nitric oxide (NO) production and antioxidant status of EMF exposed rats. Rats were randomized to following groups: Sham rats (S1 and S10) and rats exposed to 2100-MHz EMF (El and E10) for 2 h/day for 1 or 10 weeks, respectively. At the end of experimental periods, VEPs were recorded under anesthesia. Brain thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE) levels were significantly decreased in the El whereas increased in the E10 compared with their control groups. While brain catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities and NO and glutathione (GSH) levels were significantly increased in the El, reduction of superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was detected in the same group compared with the Si. Conversely, decreased CAT, GSH-Px activities and NO levels were observed in the E10 compared with the S10. Latencies of all VEP components were shortened in the El compared with the Si, whereas latencies of all VEP components, except P1, were prolonged in the E10 compared with the S10. There was a positive correlation between all VEP latencies and brain TBARS and 4-HNE values. Consequently, it could be concluded that different effects of EMFs on VEPs depend on exposure duration. In addition, our results indicated that short-term EMF could provide protective effects, while long-term EMF could have an adverse effect on VEPs and oxidant/antioxidant status. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAkdeniz University Research Foundation, TurkeyAkdeniz University [2014.02.0122.001]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant from Akdeniz University Research Foundation, Turkey (Grant no.: 2014.02.0122.001).en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectElectromagnetic Fieldsen_US
dc.subjectVisual Evoked Potentialsen_US
dc.subjectOxidative Stressen_US
dc.subjectAntioxidanten_US
dc.subjectNitric Oxideen_US
dc.title2100-MHz electromagnetic fields have different effects on visual evoked potentials and oxidant/antioxidant status depending on exposure durationen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAkpınar, Deniz
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.018
dc.identifier.volume1635en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage11en_US
dc.relation.journalBrain Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster