Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorPekmezci, Aytaç
dc.contributor.authorDilek, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T15:03:30Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T15:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0361-0918
dc.identifier.issn1532-4141
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2014.889157
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/2734
dc.descriptionWOS: 000377774300016en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to compare performances of commonly cointegration tests used in literature in terms of their empirical power and type I error probabilty for various sample sizes. As a result of the study, it has been found that some tests are not appropriate in testing cointegration in terms of empirical power and type I error probability. As a result of simulation study, (max) test for any values of and sample sizes have been found most appropriate test in conclusion.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Incen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCointegration Analysisen_US
dc.subjectGenerating Time Seriesen_US
dc.subjectWidely Cointegration Testsen_US
dc.subject37M10en_US
dc.subject37M05en_US
dc.titleThe Comparison of Performances of Widely Used Cointegration Testsen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Fen Fakültesi, İstatistik Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorPekmezci, Aytaç
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03610918.2014.889157
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2070en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2080en_US
dc.relation.journalCommunications in Statistics-Simulation and Computationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster