dc.contributor.author | Duran, Ayse Ocak | |
dc.contributor.author | Karaca, Halit | |
dc.contributor.author | Besiroglu, Mehmet | |
dc.contributor.author | Bayoglu, Ibrahim Vedat | |
dc.contributor.author | Menekse, Serkan | |
dc.contributor.author | Yapici, Heves Surmeli | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozkan, Metin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-20T16:18:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-20T16:18:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1513-7368 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.23.10375 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/3548 | |
dc.description | aksoy, asude/0000-0002-5609-9658 | en_US |
dc.description | WOS: 000351058400056 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed ID: 25556478 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: XELOX plus bevacizumab (XELOX-Bev) and FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab (FOLFIRI - Bev) treatments are an effective strategies patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this study was to compare efficacy of first-line XELOX-Bev treatment vs FOLFIRI-Bev treatment for mCRC. Materials and Methods: A total of 409 patients with mCRC who received chemotherapy were included and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=298) received XELOX-Bev and Group 2 (n=111) FOLFIRI-Bev. Comparisons were made in terms of overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival, response rate (RR), and grade 3-4 toxicity. Results: Median follow-up was 11 months in Group 1 and 15 months for Group 2. Complete remission was observed in 29 (9.7%) and 2 (1.8%) patients, partial remission in 139 (46.6%) and 27 (24.5%), stable disease in 88 (29.5%) and 49 (44.1%) and progressive disease in 42 (14.1%) and 33 (30.0%) patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively. Median OS was 25 months (range 2-57 months, 95% CI; 22.2-27.7) for Group 1 and 20 months (range 1-67 months, 95% CI; 16.8-23.1) for Group 2 (p=0.036). Median PFS was 9.6 months (range 2-36 months, 95% CI; 8.8-10.4) for Group 1 and 9 months (range 1-44 months, 95% CI; 7.4-10.5) for Group 2 (p=0.019). Objective RR was 56.4% in Group 1 and 26.1% in Group 2 (p<0.001). Conclusions: First-line XELOX-Bev is more effective with a better response rate, prolongation of median PFS/OS, and a superior safety profile compared with FOLFIRI-Bev. | en_US |
dc.item-language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Asian Pacific Organization Cancer Prevention | en_US |
dc.item-rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Metastatic Colorectal Cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | XELOX Plus Bevacizumab | en_US |
dc.subject | FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab | en_US |
dc.subject | Comparison | en_US |
dc.title | XELOX Plus Bevacizumab vs. FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colon Cancer: a Retrospective Study of the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology | en_US |
dc.item-type | article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | MÜ | en_US |
dc.contributor.departmentTemp | [Duran, Ayse Ocak; Karaca, Halit; Ozkan, Metin] Erciyes Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Kayseri, Turkey -- [Besiroglu, Mehmet; Dane, Faysal] Marmara Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Bayoglu, Ibrahim Vedat] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Ataturk Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Izmir, Turkey -- [Menekse, Serkan] Celal Bayar Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Manisa, Turkey -- [Yapici, Heves Surmeli] Kartal Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Yazilitas, Dogan] Konya Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Konya, Turkey | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.23.10375 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 15 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 23 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 10375 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 10379 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |