dc.contributor.author | Karabulut, Müjdat | |
dc.contributor.author | Karabulut, Sinem | |
dc.contributor.author | Karalezli, Aylin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-22T07:43:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-22T07:43:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Karabulut M, Karabulut S, Karalezli A. Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 9;21(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02199-5. PMID: 34879852; PMCID: PMC8656057. | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | PMID: 34879852 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02199-5 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/9707 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: To compare the refractive results of hand-held and table-mounted autorefractors.
Methods: We designed this study as an observational, cross-sectional study. We compared the mean spheric and cylinder power, spherical equivalent, Jackson cross-cylinder values, determined the limits of agreement (LoA), and evaluated the reliability of two autorefractors.
Results: We evaluated 256 eyes of 256 pediatric patients (mean age, 9.12 ± 2.26 years; range, 5-16 years). 49% of the patients were female, and 51% were male. The Nidek HandyRef-K autorefractor measured relatively more astigmatism (P < 0.001) and less hyperopia (P = 0.024). The mean differences and 95% LoA were 0.06 D ± 0.47 D (- 0.82 D to 0.98 D) in spherical power, 0.08 D ± 0.28 D (- 0.47 D to 0.64 D) in cylindrical power, 0.11 D ± 0.47 D (- 0.81 D to 1.01 D) in spherical equivalent, 0.02 D ± 0.36 D (- 0.73 D to 0.69 D) in Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°, 0.005 D ± 0.54 D (- 1.07 D to 1.06 D) in Jackson cross-cylinder power at 45°. We found the difference within 0.50 D in 244 (95%) eyes for spherical power, in 245 (96%) eyes for cylindrical power, 228 (89%) eyes for spherical equivalent, 224 (87%) eyes for Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°, 213 (83%) eyes for Jackson cross-cylinder power at 45°. When comparing devices, there were strong correlations for spherical power (Spearman's rho = 0.99, P < 0.001), cylindrical power (Spearman's rho = 0.88, P < 0.001), and spherical equivalent (Spearman's rho = 0.98, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Two autorefractors showed clinically applicable agreement limits; excellent reliability for spherical power and spherical equivalent and good reliability for cylindrical power; high positive percent agreement for spherical and cylindrical power, spherical equivalent, Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°and 45°. These results showed that both devices might be used interchangeably for screening of refractive error in children. | en_US |
dc.item-language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1186/s12886-021-02199-5 | en_US |
dc.item-rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Autorefractors | en_US |
dc.subject | Cylindrical power | en_US |
dc.subject | Jackson cross-cylinder | en_US |
dc.subject | Spherical equivalent spherical power | en_US |
dc.title | Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study | en_US |
dc.item-type | article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | MÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID | 0000-0003-1316-4656 | en_US |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Karalezli, Aylin | |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Karabulut, Müjdat | |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Karabulut, Sinem | |
dc.identifier.volume | 21 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 424 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | BMC Ophthalmology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |