Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTanrısev, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorKılıçaslan Ayna, Tülay
dc.contributor.authorÇolak, Hülya
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Banu
dc.contributor.authorErsan, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorAlp, Alper
dc.contributor.authorTuğmen, Cem
dc.contributor.authorSert, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorEngin Sevgili, Bahar
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T12:35:54Z
dc.date.available2021-12-23T12:35:54Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.issn0326-3428
dc.identifier.issn2346-8548
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/9716
dc.description.abstractBackground: Steroids are the mainstream drugs of immu-nosuppressive regimen in renal transplantation. They are successfully used on induction, maintenance and rejection treatment. Due to complications caused by steroids, treatments are switched to immunosuppressive agents. Graft dysfunction risk caused by reduced total immunosuppression disturbs clinicians very often. We documented the differences among patients by means of clinical presentation and PRA/DSA levels between patients who are using steroids and patients that were prescribed for steroid-free regimen. Methods: 82 individuals who did not use steroid and 52 patients on steroid treatment were included with similar rates of age, sex, primary renal disease, dialysis type, posttransplant follow-up duration and donor type. Pre and posttransplant PRA, DSA levels, posttransplant and current graft function and comorbidities were evaluated. Results: Individuals who do not use steroids were found to have a lower posttransplant creatinine level and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) compared to steroid users. Posttransplant and current spot urinary protein/creatinine rates were also lower in the steroid-free group. However DM, BKVN and induction therapy rates were higher in the steroid-free group. PRA and DSA levels were similar in both groups. On the other hand, posttransplant PRA-I levels were significantly higher in those with less steroid use time. Conclusions: Although steroid free regimens usually worry the clinicians, they can be preferred in patients with low immunological risk for rejection to avoid its side effects such as uncontrolled diabetes, obesity, musculoskeletal problems and cataractsen_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherASOC REGIONAL DIALISIS TRASPLANTES RENALESen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRenal transplantationen_US
dc.subjectCorticosteroidsen_US
dc.subjectPanel reactive antibodyen_US
dc.subjectDonor specific antibodyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of renal transplantation recipients those who do not use steroid with panel reactive antibody and donor specific antibodyen_US
dc.item-title.alternativeEvaluación de receptores de trasplante renal que no usan esteroides con panel de anticuerpos reactivos y anticuerpos específicos del donanteen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-2864-361Xen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAlp, Alper
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage275en_US
dc.identifier.endpage281en_US
dc.relation.journalREVISTA DE NEFROLOGIA DIALISIS Y TRASPLANTEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster