Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYeniceri, Onder
dc.contributor.authorGuney, Bunyamin
dc.contributor.authorElibol, Funda Dinc
dc.contributor.authorCullu, Nesat
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T14:41:46Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T14:41:46Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0137-7183
dc.identifier.issn1899-0967
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2019.86822
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/979
dc.descriptionWOS: 000478772500001en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 31482000en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of renal parenchymal density differences in distinguishing between acute and chronic urinary dilatations. Material and methods: Retrospectively, unenhanced CTs of 98 patients were evaluated. Thirty-three had acute urinary obstruction, and 33 had chronic urinary obstruction. Parenchymal density values (HU) and renal pelvic anterior-posterior (AP) diameters of all groups were evaluated by two different radiologists who were unaware of each other and the content of the study. The t-test was used to compare parenchymal densities and renal pelvic diameter differences with normal, acute urinary dilation and chronic urinary dilation groups. Results: Of the 98 cases who were included in the study, 33 people were in the acute obstruction group (7 females, 26 males), and 33 were in the chronic obstruction group. However, the second observer (observer 2) found a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) during the measurements of density between the obstructed and normal sides. While for the first observer (observer 1), the correlation between right and left renal density measurements of the normal cases was moderate at 0.576; correlation of measurements done by the second observer was found to be high at 0.777. Conclusions: Pale kidney findings seems to be helpful in diagnosis of acute urinary occlusion, but different results are obtained with evaluations made by different observers. Moreover, it is not a specific finding because oedema can also be seen in some other conditions, such as acute pyelonephritis; for this reason, one must be careful during the evaluation of this finding.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherInt Scientific Information Incen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKidneyen_US
dc.subjectUrinaryen_US
dc.subjectDilatationen_US
dc.subjectComputed Tomography (CT)en_US
dc.titleComparison of kidney densities of cases with urinary dilatation in unenhanced CT scanen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentTemp[Yeniceri, Onder; Guney, Bunyamin; Elibol, Funda Dinc; Cullu, Nesat] Mugla Sitki Korman Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Mugla, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/pjr.2019.86822
dc.identifier.volume84en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE269en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE273en_US
dc.relation.journalPolish Journal of Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster