• Türkçe
    • English
  • Türkçe 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Giriş
Öğe Göster 
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • Öğe Göster
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • Öğe Göster
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Evaluation of surgical resection in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: laparoscopic assessment. A European Network of Gynaecological Oncology Trial (ENGOT) group survey

Tarih

2020

Yazar

Greggi, Stefano
Falcone, Francesca
Scaffa, Cono
du Bois, Andreas
Samartzis, Eleftherios Pierre Pierre
Pujade-Lauraine, Eric
Martin, Antonio Gonzalez
Article has an altmetric score of 7

See more details

Posted by 8 X users
On 1 Facebook pages
Referenced in 1 clinical guideline sources
13 readers on Mendeley

Üst veri

Tüm öğe kaydını göster

Özet

Objective Laparoscopy is one of the diagnostic tools available for the complex clinical decision-making process in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma. This article presents the results of a survey conducted within the European Network of Gynaecological Oncology Trial (ENGOT) group aimed at reviewing the current patterns of practice at gynecologic oncology centers with regard to the evaluation of resection in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma. Methods A 24-item questionnaire was sent to the chair of the 20 cooperative groups that are currently part of the ENGOT group, and forwarded to the members within each group. Results A total of 142 questionnaires were returned. Only 39 respondents (27.5%) reported using some form of clinical (not operative) score for the evaluation of resection. The frequency of use of diagnostic laparoscopy to assess disease status and feasibility of resection was as follows: never, 21 centers (15%); only in select cases, 83 centers (58.5%); and routinely, 36 centers (25.4%). When laparoscopy was performed, 64% of users declared they made the decision to proceed with maximal effort cytoreductive surgery based on their personal/staff opinion, and 36% based on a laparoscopic score. To the question of whether laparoscopy should be considered the gold standard in the evaluation of resection, 71 respondents (50%) answered no, 66 respondents (46.5%) answered yes, whereas 5 respondents (3.5%) did not provide an answer. Conclusions This study found that laparoscopy was routinely performed to assess feasibility of cytoreduction in only 25.4% of centers in Europe. However, it was commonly used to select patients and in a minority of centers it was never used . When laparoscopy was adopted, the treatment strategy was based on laparoscopic scores only in a minority of centers.

Kaynak

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Cilt

30

Sayı

6

Bağlantı

https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-001172
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/469

Koleksiyonlar

  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2082]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6219]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6466]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Politika | Rehber | İletişim |

DSpace@Muğla

by OpenAIRE
Gelişmiş Arama

sherpa/romeo

Göz at

Tüm DSpaceBölümler & KoleksiyonlarTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreDile GöreBölüme GöreKategoriye GöreYayıncıya GöreErişim ŞekliKurum Yazarına GöreBu KoleksiyonTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreDile GöreBölüme GöreKategoriye GöreYayıncıya GöreErişim ŞekliKurum Yazarına Göre

Hesabım

GirişKayıt

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Politika || Rehber|| Yönerge || Kütüphane || Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi || OAI-PMH ||

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Muğla, Türkiye
İçerikte herhangi bir hata görürseniz, lütfen bildiriniz:

Creative Commons License
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Muğla:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.