Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGreggi, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorFalcone, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorScaffa, Cono
dc.contributor.authordu Bois, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorSamartzis, Eleftherios Pierre Pierre
dc.contributor.authorPujade-Lauraine, Eric
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Antonio Gonzalez
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T14:39:30Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T14:39:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1048-891X
dc.identifier.issn1525-1438
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-001172
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/469
dc.descriptionFalcone, Francesca/0000-0002-3729-2321en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000538153300018en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 32354792en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective Laparoscopy is one of the diagnostic tools available for the complex clinical decision-making process in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma. This article presents the results of a survey conducted within the European Network of Gynaecological Oncology Trial (ENGOT) group aimed at reviewing the current patterns of practice at gynecologic oncology centers with regard to the evaluation of resection in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma. Methods A 24-item questionnaire was sent to the chair of the 20 cooperative groups that are currently part of the ENGOT group, and forwarded to the members within each group. Results A total of 142 questionnaires were returned. Only 39 respondents (27.5%) reported using some form of clinical (not operative) score for the evaluation of resection. The frequency of use of diagnostic laparoscopy to assess disease status and feasibility of resection was as follows: never, 21 centers (15%); only in select cases, 83 centers (58.5%); and routinely, 36 centers (25.4%). When laparoscopy was performed, 64% of users declared they made the decision to proceed with maximal effort cytoreductive surgery based on their personal/staff opinion, and 36% based on a laparoscopic score. To the question of whether laparoscopy should be considered the gold standard in the evaluation of resection, 71 respondents (50%) answered no, 66 respondents (46.5%) answered yes, whereas 5 respondents (3.5%) did not provide an answer. Conclusions This study found that laparoscopy was routinely performed to assess feasibility of cytoreduction in only 25.4% of centers in Europe. However, it was commonly used to select patients and in a minority of centers it was never used . When laparoscopy was adopted, the treatment strategy was based on laparoscopic scores only in a minority of centers.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBmj Publishing Groupen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOvarian Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopesen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Proceduresen_US
dc.subjectOperativeen_US
dc.subjectPeritoneal Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectFallopian Tube Neoplasmsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of surgical resection in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: laparoscopic assessment. A European Network of Gynaecological Oncology Trial (ENGOT) group surveyen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentTemp[Greggi, Stefano; Falcone, Francesca; Scaffa, Cono] Fdn G Pascale, Ist Nazl Tumori, Dept Gynecol Oncol Surg, IRCCS, I-80131 Naples, Italy -- [Greggi, Stefano; Falcone, Francesca; Scaffa, Cono] Fdn G Pascale, Multictr Italian Trials Ovarian Canc & Gynecol Ma, IRCSS, Ist Nazl Tumori, Naples, Italy -- [du Bois, Andreas] Kliniken Essen Mitte gGmbH, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakol Onkol AGO Grp, Essen, Germany -- [du Bois, Andreas] Kliniken Essen Mitte gGmbH, Dept Gynecol & Gynecol Oncol, Essen, Germany -- [Samartzis, Eleftherios Pierre Pierre] Univ Hosp Zurich, Swiss Grp Clin Canc Res SAKK, Zurich, Switzerland -- [Samartzis, Eleftherios Pierre Pierre] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Gynecol, Zurich, Switzerlanden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/ijgc-2019-001172
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage819en_US
dc.identifier.endpage824en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Gynecological Canceren_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster