• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Evaluation of surgical resection in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: laparoscopic assessment. A European Network of Gynaecological Oncology Trial (ENGOT) group survey

Date

2020

Author

Greggi, Stefano
Falcone, Francesca
Scaffa, Cono
du Bois, Andreas
Samartzis, Eleftherios Pierre Pierre
Pujade-Lauraine, Eric
Martin, Antonio Gonzalez
Article has an altmetric score of 7

See more details

Posted by 8 X users
On 1 Facebook pages
Referenced in 1 clinical guideline sources
13 readers on Mendeley

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

Objective Laparoscopy is one of the diagnostic tools available for the complex clinical decision-making process in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma. This article presents the results of a survey conducted within the European Network of Gynaecological Oncology Trial (ENGOT) group aimed at reviewing the current patterns of practice at gynecologic oncology centers with regard to the evaluation of resection in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma. Methods A 24-item questionnaire was sent to the chair of the 20 cooperative groups that are currently part of the ENGOT group, and forwarded to the members within each group. Results A total of 142 questionnaires were returned. Only 39 respondents (27.5%) reported using some form of clinical (not operative) score for the evaluation of resection. The frequency of use of diagnostic laparoscopy to assess disease status and feasibility of resection was as follows: never, 21 centers (15%); only in select cases, 83 centers (58.5%); and routinely, 36 centers (25.4%). When laparoscopy was performed, 64% of users declared they made the decision to proceed with maximal effort cytoreductive surgery based on their personal/staff opinion, and 36% based on a laparoscopic score. To the question of whether laparoscopy should be considered the gold standard in the evaluation of resection, 71 respondents (50%) answered no, 66 respondents (46.5%) answered yes, whereas 5 respondents (3.5%) did not provide an answer. Conclusions This study found that laparoscopy was routinely performed to assess feasibility of cytoreduction in only 25.4% of centers in Europe. However, it was commonly used to select patients and in a minority of centers it was never used . When laparoscopy was adopted, the treatment strategy was based on laparoscopic scores only in a minority of centers.

Source

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volume

30

Issue

6

URI

https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-001172
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/469

Collections

  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2082]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6219]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6466]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Muğla

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Guide|| Instruction || Library || Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University || OAI-PMH ||

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Muğla:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.